Retaliation Claims in Employment
Many employment statutes have anti-retaliation provisions. Retaliation includes job terminations and other adverse job consequences. The federal discrimination statutes all have retaliation provisions (Discrimination Based Upon Age, Disability, Pregnancy, Race, Religion, and Serious Medical Conditions – FMLA). OSHA also has anti-retaliation provisions meaning an employee cannot be retaliated against for making a complaint to OSHA. Under the Federal False Claims Act, employees of companies receiving federal funds cannot be fired for complaining false claims are being made to obtain the federal funds. Employees of publicly traded companies also receive protection against retaliation if they complain of Securities and Exchange Act (SEC) Violations or fraud.
The Following Statutes Contain Anti-Retaliation Provisions:
- Title VII which prohibits discrimination in employment based upon Race and Sex
- Americans Disability Act (ADA) which prohibits discrimination based upon Disability,
- And provides reasonable accommodations
- ADEA which prohibits Age discrimination
- Family Medical Leave Act that protects employees who have serious medical conditions
- Pregnancy Discrimination laws
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) if an employee complains about certain illegal wage
Files a complaint for Overtime Violations
- OSHA which protects health and safety in the workplace
- SOX which protects employees of publicly traded corporations who complain of their
Employer fraud and SEC violations
- Federal False Claims Act protects employees who complain their employer has made
Federal False Claims
Employment retaliation lawsuits may succeed if the employee does not prove the illegality of the underlying conduct they complain about, but are retaliated against (including being fired) for complaining. This favors the policy employees should not be shy about complaining about potential illegal issues even if the issues do not end up being illegal.
Participation in protected activities can be broadly construed. Testifying truthfully in a sexual harassment investigation and then being fired is retaliation. Speaking to a government entity during an OSHA investigation and being fired as a result is retaliation. Refusing to destroy evidence of discrimination and then being fired is retaliation.
- Disobeying an employer's directions to perjure oneself in a discrimination investigation
- Requesting time off for a disability or serious medical condition under FMLA
- Requesting a religious accommodation
- Threatening to file an administrative complaint with the EEOC
- Rebuffing an act of sexual harassment
- Making a complaint to OSHA about unsafe work practices
- Complaining about discrimination
- Questioning whether actions are being taken due to an employee's age
- Exercising one's rights during pregnancy to have maternity leave
- Making a complaint of sexual harassment
- Demanding valid claims of sexual harassment be investigated
Retaliation claims generally require the employee to have a reasonable, good faith belief they are complaining about something unlawful, or exercising statutory rights they actually have. Outlandish, defamatory complaints of discrimination made to preserve one's job do not protect somebody from retaliation. A complaint to OSHA the employer is engaging in unsafe work practices because they do not have paper cups, but have hard plastic cups is not the type of complaint a court will want to consider a good faith complaint.
Retaliation claims generally also require some amount of opposition. Merely mentioning something in passing, a supervisor did not hear, is not likely to be real opposition to protect against employment retaliation. Firmly stating one will not dump chemicals into the Back Bay and backing that up with a terse letter to management does sound like reasonable opposition to illegal OSHA violations. In the real world of employment retaliation lawsuits, an employment lawyer is not likely to take a case in which the stated opposition is weak, nobody cared, and the acts complained about were not even a true violation of a statute with an anti-retaliation provision.
Oppositions that go overboard are also not well met. Violent picketing, efforts to hamper a company's business, neglect of work duties, disrupting the office, and distributing confidential information about the employer was held not to constitute reasonable opposition.
If you believe you were retaliated against for exercising a legal right, please contact our office to speak to an experienced Boston labor lawyer.
Our Firm: No upfront fees or costs
Contingency Fee Representation
All employment cases for employees are taken on a contingency basis. We are only paid a fee when and if we win your case, and we advance all litigation costs. Our goal is to make expert legal representation accessible to every hardworking employee.
Serving Massachusetts County
We have proudly served all of Massachusetts County since 1993.
The Employment Lawyers Group has successfully handled
2,000+
Separate California Employment Cases
Media Engagements
Fatal error: Uncaught TypeError: number_format(): Argument #1 ($num) must be of type float, string given in /home/bostonla/public_html/WorkLawyerCA.info/get_results.php:46 Stack trace: #0 /home/bostonla/public_html/WorkLawyerCA.info/get_results.php(46): number_format('625,000') #1 {main} thrown in /home/bostonla/public_html/WorkLawyerCA.info/get_results.php on line 46
Practice Areas
Discrimination
Age, Disability, Family Medical Leave (FMLA/CFRA), Gender, National Origin, Pregnancy, Race, and Sexual Orientation claims.
Unpaid Wages & Overtime
Recovering earnings for Overtime, Bonuses, Commissions, Meal & Rest Breaks, and Prevailing Wage violations.
Sexual Harassment
Compassionate and effective representation for victims of sexual harassment and hostile work environment claims.
Wrongful Termination
Representing employees terminated in violation of public policy, contracts, or California and Federal law.
Leaves & Retaliation
Protecting employees who face adverse actions after reporting illegal activity or taking protected medical leave.
Whistleblowers
Advocating for employees who report fraud, waste, or abuse in their organizations under whistleblower protections.
About Firm Founder, Karl Gerber
Firm Founder, Karl Gerber, has been an employment wrongful termination attorney since 1993. He has represented a wide range of employees throughout California.
Mr. Gerber has won 51 of the binding arbitrations and jury trials he first chaired, and a number of his appeals are published. This deep trial experience is the foundation of the firm's strategic approach to litigation.
The employment attorneys employed by the Employment Lawyers Group have worked at the firm well in excess of five years, have also tried many different labor cases, and have all been extensively trained on employment wrongful termination by Karl Gerber.
Ready to Discuss Your Case?
Your rights as an employee matter. Contact us for a free, confidential case review.
Contact Us
Share Your Workplace Situation With Our Attorneys
Prefer to speak directly?
Call Us: (877) 525-0700